assignment 2

please follow the instruction in the additional materials. if you have any question please contact me

Leadership Development Case Study: Consolidated Products (p. 58-59 text)

Assignment Instructions and Requirements

1. Read the case study identified in the title above.

2. You are encourage to discuss the case with other members of the class, specifically considering the 3 questions specific to the case study (p. 58-59)

3. Submit a written copy (not less than 1, but not more than 2, pages) of your assessment and recommendations in accordance with the formatting requirements stated below.
a) Title - centered, 12 pt. Times New Roman Bold font, name of assignment (as listed on class schedule unless otherwise noted) followed by your name.
b) Content – left margin aligned, 12 pt. Times New Roman, double line spacing
– following the 12 pt. Times New Roman Bold font subheading ‘Comparative Assessment of Leadership Traits and Behaviors’ a explanatory summary of your combined responses to questions 1 and 2 in text.
– following the 12 pt. Times New Roman Bold font subheading ‘‘Recommendations’ a explanatory summary of your response to question 3 in text.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not write a summary of the case study (I have already read the case and do not need to read it again)

4. Submit your paper to the respective drop box before the stated due date and time. Late submissions will receive no credit (0 points)

The following criteria will be used for evaluation:
Criteria
Comparative Assessment (4 points)
A clearly written, insightful comparative assessment of leadership behaviors and traits.
Met expectations (3 or 2 points)
Superficial and/or incomplete assessment of only one person’s behaviors or traits

Fell short of expectations (1 point)
Wrote something but it is not related to topic or case study
Unsatisfactory
Recommendations (2 points)
Recommendations are clearly written and reasonable based on information provided.

Met expectations (1 point)
Recommendations are unrealistic, impractical, and/or based on false information

Fell short of expectations (1 point)
Wrote something but it is not related to topic or case study
Unsatisfactory
Professionalism (2 points)
Followed directions, no formatting errors, no writing errors (1 point)
Followed directions and less than 3 formatting and/or writing errors (0 points)
Did not follow directions or formatting requirements and/or more than 2 writing errors
Timeliness (2 points) Submitted before the due date (0 points) Submitted on the due date